tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post421481195404012768..comments2023-11-24T09:54:06.588-05:00Comments on W. Tracy Parnell: Palmer McBrideW Tracy Parnellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-49156092160862211002023-11-24T04:09:59.331-05:002023-11-24T04:09:59.331-05:00Hi Bill, I think Greg Parker is wrong about the ri...Hi Bill, I think Greg Parker is wrong about the riots in Fort. Worth that he mentioned in his website. He attributed it to a protest by white Fort Worth residents against an African-American family from moving in. But note that McBride said about “an anti-Negro or anti-communist riot on a high school grounds in Ft. Worth, Texas" in CE1386. It's more probable that the riots in question happened in Mansfield, a suburb city 20 miles from Fort Worth. There mobs of white pro-segregationists gathered to prevent the registration of three African-American youths in the high school in the wake of the Brown v. The Board of Education ruling. This happened on Aug 30, 1956. You can check it out here: https://calendar.eji.org/racial-injustice/aug/30RashBoldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12401672549452248963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-2226022031282259592017-12-04T19:24:44.733-05:002017-12-04T19:24:44.733-05:00"I admit that it would probably be difficult ..."I admit that it would probably be difficult to find a truly independent source to evaluate the H&L claims. I would say either a journalist or former investigator would be qualified to do the job."<br /><br />substitute the name(s) -- Tracy Parnell, Greg Parker, Paul Tregos = same resultnicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-45682823033746322422017-11-06T09:26:45.040-05:002017-11-06T09:26:45.040-05:00"But it the H&L world it is "evidenc..."But it the H&L world it is "evidence" of the plot."<br /><br />Sloppy reasoning. There WAS a plot - it just wasn't the false LN one that you promote.<br />nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-3694092024875126512017-11-02T21:41:59.403-04:002017-11-02T21:41:59.403-04:00The question has been asked and answered several t...The question has been asked and answered several times-there was no missing tooth.<br /><br />Right. It was LEE whose tooth was knocked out. HARVEY's teeth were intact- in life and in death.<br />Would you be allowed to post comments praising ISLAM on a site like JREF?nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-6415190283767467542017-10-19T16:37:44.919-04:002017-10-19T16:37:44.919-04:00Go all the way back to the beginning and Jim Marrs...Go all the way back to the beginning and Jim Marrs' class. Armstrong gave a presentation that argued for two Oswalds. When Gary Mack and Dave Perry explained to him that McBride was simply wrong because a mountain of other evidence refutes him, Armstrong decided that Mack and Perry were "cynical and narrow minded." He then set about the business of finding "evidence" to support his conclusion. The problem is, professional investigators will tell you that it is not unusual to find contradictory evidence, especially when much of that evidence is eyewitness testimony.W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-36646329247666315582017-10-19T15:28:49.888-04:002017-10-19T15:28:49.888-04:00TP said: "Armstrong had a predetermined conc...TP said: "Armstrong had a predetermined conclusion which was based on a few cherry picked "facts" and he set about finding "confirmation" for that conclusion."<br /><br />Do you have evidence that supports this? No, you don't. If you did, you would provide it.nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-49760089767705433782017-10-05T09:21:58.957-04:002017-10-05T09:21:58.957-04:00Speaking of not having to refute actual evidence, ...Speaking of not having to refute actual evidence, why don't you guys try and refute the 1981 Oswald exhumation that disproves the H&L theory? W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-33766222112157515722017-10-05T08:53:03.617-04:002017-10-05T08:53:03.617-04:00I am aware that TP doesn't get rich from his b...I am aware that TP doesn't get rich from his book sales. But he also doesn't get any attention for his research without a "vehicle" for that research. And that is where H&L comes in. Note that he doesn't have to spend one minute defending his theories, he has you guys to do that for him. Pretty good setup if you ask me.<br /><br />It's curious that TP seems to believe his own BS is - w/out having to refute actual evidence.<br />nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-67525000165300972382017-10-02T18:00:16.655-04:002017-10-02T18:00:16.655-04:00Michael,
It's a very thankless job to respond ...Michael,<br />It's a very thankless job to respond to people that never post any evidence in support of their<br />claims that H&L has been debunked, isn't it.nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-9057203869274235062017-10-02T16:36:09.277-04:002017-10-02T16:36:09.277-04:00JH, DJ. SL, and others post evidence. The only re...JH, DJ. SL, and others post evidence. The only response from Truthers is nonsense and suggestions that GP,TP, and unnamed others have already rebutted the evidence. Rebutted is one thing - poor memory, intentional deceit, honest mistakes etc. Actually REFUTING the evidence is never done...because facts are stubborn things. <br />nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-14853137329856685322017-05-26T00:40:42.940-04:002017-05-26T00:40:42.940-04:00Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, after that last commen...Thanks for the reply.<br />Yeah, after that last comment I did a little research and found some HSCA stuff<br />on the two Oswald theory...I also saw something on Popkin from the MID SIXTIES!<br />that I had totally forgotten about.<br />So rather than some new, cutting edge theory(in the late 90s) this goes back<br />practically to the beginning!<br />Its been recycled-debunked and recycled-debunked again...<br />Thankless job, but I guess it was your turn in the barrel.MICHAELhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256087337608364192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-1085006538822327192017-05-18T08:11:06.221-04:002017-05-18T08:11:06.221-04:00Michael,
Thanks for stopping by. Yes, the HSCA lo...Michael,<br /><br />Thanks for stopping by. Yes, the HSCA looked into double Oswald theories:<br /><br />https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol8/html/HSCA_Vol8_0115a.htm<br /><br />Some of the work, such as the handwriting analysis, is applicable to Armstrong's theories and some is not. Of course, the 1981 exhumation disproved both Eddowes and Armstrong.W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-43874845141663568462017-05-17T21:22:33.912-04:002017-05-17T21:22:33.912-04:00Tracy, did the HCSA ever address any "two Osw...Tracy, did the HCSA ever address any "two Oswald" theories?<br />I read the Eddowes book sometime in the 80s and if I'm not mistaken<br />He was researching/writing the book in the 70s(which eventually led to<br />the 1981 exhumation)<br />I actually quite liked the Eddowes book and thought he might have been on to<br />something...then again I was a lot more gullible back then!<br /><br />I wonder if we would even have a H and L theory if Eddowes book never existed?<br />MICHAELhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256087337608364192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-79931033766877015592017-01-21T08:41:26.219-05:002017-01-21T08:41:26.219-05:00Thanks AK Icicle!Thanks AK Icicle!W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-6756323278045205912017-01-21T04:03:41.056-05:002017-01-21T04:03:41.056-05:00Thank You Tracy for removing any foundation the Ha...Thank You Tracy for removing any foundation the Harvey And Lee theory had.<br />Armstrong's rhetoric makes Lee guilty.<br />Having had the pleasure to ruffle John's feathers on many an occasion I encourage you to continue.<br />The boat trip and VD records were proven wrong.<br />The Zoo photo also shown to be Lee Harvey Oswald, one person.<br />There is nothing left for the disciples of John to use to support this less than credible idea.<br />The capper is whom John claims is Harvey, a big ugly gut whom looks nothing like Lee Harvey Oswald.<br />Armstrong is a laughing stock! <br />The guy needs to stop this ridiculous assertion he uses to sensationalize book sales. Well that doorstop is a hamper to actual investigation and research. <br /><br />Oh and Nickname, or John Armstrong, whomever... kindly tell us what's left of your precious doppelganger distortion? <br /><br />AK.Iciclehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17377037960440449665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-73631928088986952162017-01-20T08:31:14.427-05:002017-01-20T08:31:14.427-05:00But McBride was the foundation of the H&L theo...But McBride was the foundation of the H&L theory. If McBride was wrong, then the premise of the theory is as well. As for Horne, he refuted Armstrong’s assertions about the tax documents. If the tax documents are valid as Horne believes, the entire H&L theory is false. So, it is more than “a few minor points.”W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-82031268846717574792017-01-19T21:58:43.095-05:002017-01-19T21:58:43.095-05:00WELL THEN. There you have it. Parnell is well on...WELL THEN. There you have it. Parnell is well on his way to proving that if a few things in H&L are subject to question - that's proof enough for Parnell to state that he's solved the conspiracy to assassinate JFK and the evidence of two Oswalds is merely the result of mistaken identity and "hey. look over there."<br /><br />And Doug Horne also disagrees with a few minor points in H&L.nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-44216043257310259912017-01-19T18:38:06.372-05:002017-01-19T18:38:06.372-05:00Nickname,
The problem is you have to prove someth...Nickname,<br /><br />The problem is you have to prove something was forged. That something, as it pertains to this discussion is mainly the tax documents. But Doug Horne, who is a conspiracy believer, looked into the matter and completely ruled out any funny stuff. Things like the riots in 1956 instead of 1958 can't be faked and are confirmation that McBride was simply mistaken. Same with McBride's Lifton interview.W Tracy Parnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06802333178704791548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233746604277874790.post-89641645888175888692017-01-19T18:27:14.081-05:002017-01-19T18:27:14.081-05:00Parnell seems to believe that Mr. Armstrong is qui...Parnell seems to believe that Mr. Armstrong is quite willing to fiddle with evidence where doing so is necessary to support his theories, but is something he must want us to believe the government would never do. The reality<br />is just the opposite.nicknamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02389083529073874224noreply@blogger.com